The Blank Noise Project asked for a blog-a-thon on March 8th; a way of celebrating the strengths of those who resist, in some way, street level harassment. A great idea. Yet the words ‘Action Hero’ somehow constrain me: what is Action, and who is a Hero? This March 8th, I was in the middle of a workshop with a group of police officers from States across South India and reiterating – many times over, in different ways – that women are *not* women’s worst enemies (yes, a treatise on that soon). Was that being an Action Hero? I work with men, with law enforcers, with some of the most patriarchal structures in the world, and I do not abuse, I do not indignify, I do not violate. Perhaps more honestly, I do my best not to (there are times when I bite my tongue, hard. It hurts). But certainly I describe, I analyse, I provoke, I persuade. I challenge. Is that being an Action Hero?
Whatever the ways in which Jasmeen, Mangs, Chinmayee and Annie conceived of it, philosophical flimsies are not going to cut it. So let me remind myself – and tell others – of a couple of lessons I learnt early. One was when I was in college in Delhi. Being in the hostel, any kind of travel involved painful hours in a sweaty bus or painfully expensive moments in an auto. The choice was simple, and I learnt more about harassment on DTC (Delhi Transport Corporation) buses than any hi-falutin’ economics. Perhaps (says the philosopher), I did get somewhere after all.
I learnt that anger is not always strategic. It’s a peculiar Delhi phenomenon – and I find it slowly spreading to other cities, including Bangalore – that if you raise your voice in anger against someone who’s harassing you, very few people are likely to support you. However obvious the harassment, however gruesome the details. Someone who’s not just touching you, but who’s conveniently using the lack of interstitial space to slam against every bit of you and rub himself up in perverse joy. What works? Shame. And humour. Humour, you ask in horror? Was it funny, what he was doing? No, it wasn’t. Far from. But what worked was this: I would say loudly, so that as many people around could hear me, in as bored a clarion call as possible, ‘Kya bhaiya, yeh sab aap ghar me nahi kar sakthe, kya? [Why, brother, can’t you do all this at home?]’. There would be titters, some loud guffaws and the slammer-against-body (whose face I couldn’t even see, considering the position I was in) would suddenly ease himself up, and leave the bus at the next convenient moment. Or at least move himself from the parking spot that was my body.
Another moment of self-preservation epiphany. I was travelling from Karwar to Raichur via Hubli (all in north Karnataka). I ended up being in a bus that landed up in Raichur at 2 in the morning [Note to self: try not to travel alone to unknown destinations at odd hours of the night. As far as possible]. On the bus, I had made ample and effective use of a loaded water bottle to preserve my bums from groping fingers and toes belonging to the person sitting in the seat behind me. When I got down at the bus stop, I found the place strewn with sleeping bodies and bags. Luckily for single women, very few public places in India are ‘deserted’. The trouble is, those who are temporarily inhabiting that space may not (as mentioned before) support you in a moment of crisis. Anyhow, no one was awake at the Raichur bus stop; it was deathly quiet and with only one tube light that cast a pool of light over a limited area. Some instinctual common sense made me clamber over the bodies and bags, shift a few of those around gently, and settle into a position right in the middle of the light. Not a moment too soon. A burly man, probably in his mid thirties, came up out of the shadows, and watched me for a while. He circled around the bus stop, over and over again, waiting, I feel with hindsight, for me to move out of the light. I didn’t. I was terrified, but I wasn’t going to run. So lesson number 2: running isn’t always the solution. Stay in the light, and be prepared to scream.
After about what felt like a few hours (but was probably closer to 45 minutes), he realised I wasn’t going to budge. And he left. I stayed awake, clutching my bag, clutching myself, thanking my surprisingly sharp instincts that I hadn’t done something unbearably foolish. Lesson number 3: trust that gut of yours. It is seldom wrong. ‘Rationality’ is judged by outcome.
i LOVE the humour one. it’s so hard to do though and then you have to fight with yourself to see it as an option because there’s a defiant voice in your head saying, “why should I think of strategy – its not MY fault”!!? which is just self defeating. sigh.
I know, I know, it’s tough… but think of it this way; the strategy’s not just for you. If it shifts something in his head, in his way of seeing and being in the world, you’re doing yourself – and a few others, at the very least – a favour.
I use humour a lot in my workshops. Occasionally with barely hidden gritted teeth. 🙂
Humor actually works the best.
My secondary school used to be located in a very isolated housing estate which used to be a haven for flashers.
I was thirteen when I encountered my first flasher, and I was understandably horrified, oddly guilty and very angry.
I finally got the guts to ask a senior in my school and she gave me the best advice on the matter.
The next time I ran into that idiot, I pointed and laughed out loud [even though I was digusted inside] and made a comment about … err you fill in the blanks.
Another time, a group of Idiots decided to follow my friends and I back to our hotel in Jakarta. We played a game of ‘dodge the dodgy folk’ by popping in and out of shops, even a dentist before we finally lost them.
But as Anasuya puts it, always stay in the light!
Nice post there BTW, as long as there are individuals who think that having an extra bit of flesh between their legs entitles them to get away with anything, women will continue to walk the streets in fear.
Div
Came here from Shivam’s blog. Liked your posts. Appreciate your courage esp with that Raichur bus stand kind of episode.
1. BNP I think is overall a pretty good thing, though I have reservations on the “No looking” part of harassment. Its very undefinable though I know what ‘look’ they must be talking about. I disagree with the ‘philosophical flimsy’ part of your post.
2. Annie’s blog has plenty of practical advice just like yours here: no punching/ only screaming, situation judgement etc.
3. Overall IMHO its good to keep with the inerstices / engagement approach you seem to have.
One strange way this helps is it enables or helps others to get enraged when they see somebody who has every right to go BLAST not doing so. It brings them to your side, they rage for you.
This above is from my experience.
As a guy I dont know why I would not side with a lady that has been harassed and is BLASTing away at her harasser, but have to admit that it is likely I wont- unless he is visibly harassing her then.
Possible reasons:
– we prefer to avoid messy situations generally
– cowardice
– a feeling that she is in control now and doesnt need help
– did not actually witness it ourselves
– some few occasions known when some guy has been falsely accused of harassment, so prefer to avoid; ie. guilt not clear.
All of the above look like lame excuses even to me after reading abt harassment on some of these blogs.
regards,
Jai
@Divya:Great stories, very practical strategies. Now to wait for the day we won’t need them. Revolution…!
@Jai: Thanks for dropping by and for being so honest about your reflections. I think men like you are a great support in the every day work women do battling harassment; the very fact that you’ve spent time wondering why you might not aid someone in such a situation probably means you’ll be there for her the very next time!
I do feel working in the interstices is important, but I also realise that it’s not always possible. One learns to judge the moment and figure out the strategy for it… And sometimes, we just lose our tempers and *blast*, as you put it, because we’re so damnably tired of having to cope all the time.
…And why don’t you agree with the ‘philosophical flimsies’ part of the post? Not philosophical enough or not flimsy enough? 🙂